Union notes from Union / Management Meeting

Present – Prince Charles Alexander, Rick Applin, Charles Cassara, Peggy Codding, Peter Cokkinias, Beth Denisch, Marti Epstein, Danny Harrington, Jeff Perry, Wendy Rolfe, Jackson Schultz, Mike Scott, Will Silvio.  

Management – Larry Simpson, Jay Kennedy, Kari Juusela, Jeanine Cowen, Chris Connors, Amelia Koch, 

1. Larry opened the meeting. We have the largest graduating class this year, 902.

2. Contract clarification points

a) Defined benefit eligibility, page 58. We clarified the language.

b) Seniority/approved leaves, if you are on leave, it still counts towards length of service. We have a case to look at and we will handle each on a case-by-case basis.

c) Wage renegotiation eligibility. We will look at each case individually, but the contract says every three years, that is the intent of the language. But the preference is to consider each case individually and not try to delay the faculty member an opportunity to re-negotiate their salary.

d) Part-time promotion to full-time status. Generally, these positions are being treated as outside hires, do they have to be in the same rank and receive a certain salary that they are at now? Larry: usually they are looking at a new status in regards to both rank and salary, there is flexibility, they may or may not move up, and we handle these on a case-by-case basis.

3. Gender issues at Berklee - Review of Committee Discussion. Beth started the discussion. The goal is to have no discrimination on campus of any kind but we need to find a way to achieve it. Administration and faculty can both model behavior to create the most comfortable environment for all the students, faculty, and staff. Wendy discussed two cases of students and lack of confidentiality with very personal issues, which brings up the concept of training and how to report specific events that occur on campus. Chris Connors talked about procedures and the desire to follow-up with the admin side. 

How do we go about changing the culture here at Berklee with the music industry as it is? Perhaps we can start a joint committee to look at the issues of gender identity and sexual orientation. 

It is not always about equitable pay and promotions, we need to make sure there is a certain level of civility, it does not make you less of a musician or teacher if you subscribe to the idea of fairness and appropriate behavior in an academic setting.

Larry: so much of the administrations work is in confidence, it may sometimes appear that we are not doing the work, but we just can’t talk about it.

Chris: we are working on a lot of different levels with committees that have faculty representation; we are working on a lot of specific topics but maybe not in the open, due to the nature of the topics. The specific incidents should NOT be dealt with in a committee. There is a difference between specific incidents and trying to change a culture.

Chris: we are creating a health room, it is complicated, but we are committed to create a couple of locations that people can use for lactation or other health issues (insulin shots, etc.)

Mike: we understand that changing the culture is not an easy thing, but we have succeeded to a certain extent, but we need to go further. We all feel that at the public events, all people involved should be sensitive to all issues as they work on their speeches. Also, elevating consciousness in the classroom is another way we can move forward. 

Chris: there is a BTOT presentation that creates an inclusive classroom that is going around to all the departments.

Danny: to change our culture it must be at the grass roots level, we just need to keep trying. 

Larry: we are all on the same page, we are committed to creating an environment for all. People must own their behavior and continue to make changes, hire the best people that we can to represent that mindset. 

Minutes from Union Executive Committee Meeting

Present – Rick Applin, Charles Cassara, Peggy Codding, Peter Cokkinias, Beth Denisch, Marti Epstein, Rich Grudzinski, Jonathan Holland, Jeff Perry, Diane Richardson, Wendy Rolfe, Jackson Schultz, Mike Scott, Will Silvio, and Department Reps.

  1. Marti made a motion to accept the minutes from the previous meeting and update the website. Jonathan seconded and the vote was unanimous to accept the minutes.
     
  2. Mike discussed the new role of the Department Reps: when faculty have questions, we want the department reps to try and address them. We are trying to de-centralize and disseminate information for all faculty. The faculty members know the dept. reps.; they don’t always know the Executive Committee. 
     
  3. For salary questions, Rich Vigdor is the person to contact; for all benefits questions, contact HR; for all individual contract information, contact Juliana Horton. We have grown from 138 faculty to 525 since the Union started back in 1986.
     
  4. Jackson discussed the new role, get a copy of the contract, read it, look up information. The concepts in the FAQ, talking points, etc. are for the reps to get more familiar with their new role. Ask your chair if you can make an announcement in your department meeting to let the people know who you are and what you can do. The intent is to personalize the union and the information.
     
  5. Mike continued to discuss the importance of the reps and their expanded role. Make sure you have a copy of the contract to look things up, etc. 
     
  6. Can we put together a list of names, extensions, of people to contact for each situation? We will put together a family tree of dept. reps. and share that this summer and we can expand on that to include some of that information.
     
  7. Mike went over the FAQ and addressed the importance of being affiliated with AFT and AFT-MA. Mike will be sending out an e-mail to share this information. 

Minutes from Union Executive Committee Meeting

Present – Prince Charles Alexander, Rick Applin, Charles Cassara, Peter Cokkinias, Beth Denisch, Marti Epstein, Rich Grudzinski, Jonathan Holland, Michael Heyman, Jeff Perry, Wendy Rolfe, Jackson Schultz, Mike Scott, Will Silvio. 

Guest - John Eldert

  1. Rich made a motion to accept the minutes from the previous meeting and update the website. Peter seconded and the vote was unanimous to accept the minutes.
     
  2. John Eldert is our guest today to discuss the Boston Consortium project called “Ed Health” and update us on the “Healthy You” program.  The consortium has fifteen colleges in the Boston area with the addition of several workers comp groups that have agreed to work together to create an umbrella group to look at collective benefits. The goal is to even out claims, negotiation of premiums, and to lower the overall cost of healthcare. With the group owned concept we share the risk of healthcare, the group can negotiate with providers directly, with some providers in the group, Harvard, Tufts, etc. this can be a benefit. Along with the “healthy you” program, we can have TPA coaching to help us become healthier. We will have incentives to participate in the programs, like $100 to take part in health screenings, etc. 13 of the 15 consortium schools have already agreed to share health information regarding their constituents, to see the risk factors. Currently, we are being priced at 1700 employees, not a very large group, with all these schools together we will have much more bargaining power, we currently cannot shape our own plan, we don’t have the numbers. With this group idea, we can shape our healthcare plan to fit our members. What would help at Berklee to make Berklee healthier … that is one of our goals with the “healthy you” program. 
     
  3. Mike: we experienced a resistance to the PPO during bargaining last year, how can this help? We need to have all the options for our members.
     
  4. John: With a larger group like this, we will have all the option still available. Because we will be controlling our own underwriting, we can shape the plans to suit all the members. Another item we are looking at, the co-pays, trying to get them as low as possible. But we have several different offerings with several different co-pay structures. Overall, it may be a lower increase as opposed to actual lower costs.